| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
19/07/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/07/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
LEADLEY, P.; GONZALEZ, A.; OBURA, D.; KRUG, C.B.; LONDOÑO-MURCIA, M.C.; MILLETTE, K.L.; RADULOVICI, A.; RANKOVIC, A.; SHANNON, L.J.; ARCHER, E.; ATO ARMAH, F.; NIC BAX, N,; CHAUDHARI, K.; COSTELLO, M.J.; DÁVALOS, L.M.; ROQUE, F DE O; DECLERCK, F.; DEE, L.E.; ESSL, F.; FERRIER, S.; GENOVESI, P.; GUARIGUATA, M.R.; HASHIMOTO, S.; IFEJIKA SPERANZA, CH.; ISBELL, F.; KOK, M.; LAVERY, S.D.; LECLÈRE, D.; LOYOLA, R.; LWASA, S.; MCGEOCH, M.; MORI, A.S.; NICHOLSON, E.; OCHOA, J.M.; ÖLLERER, K.; POLASKY, S.; RONDININI, C.; SCHROER, S.; SELOMANE, O.; SHEN, X.; STRASSBURG, B.; RASHID SUMAILA, U.; TITTENSOR, D.P.; TURAK, E.; URBINA, L.; VALLEJOS, M.; VÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, E.; VERBURG, P.H.; VISCONTI, P.; WOODLEY, S.; XU, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
PAUL LEADLEY, Laboratoire d’Ecologie Syste´ matique Evolution, Universite´ Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Paris, France.; ANDREW GONZALEZ, Department of Biology, Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; DAVID OBURA, Coastal Oceans Research and Development (CORDIO) East Africa, Mombasa, Kenya.; CORNELIA B. KRUG, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.; MARIA CECILIA LONDOÑO-MURCIA, Scopus Research Institute of Biological Resources Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.; KATIE L. MILLETTE, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; ADRIANA RADULOVICI, Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.; ALEKSANDAR RANKOVIC, Paris Institute of Political Studies, Paris, France.; LYNNE J. SHANNON, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.; EMMA ARCHER, Department of Geography, Geoinformatics, and Meteorology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.; FREDERICK ATO ARMAH, Scopus Department of Environmental Science, School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.; NIC BAX, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, NSW, Australia.; KALPANA CHAUDHARI, Institute for Sustainable Development and Research (ISDR), Mumbai, India.; MARK JOHN COSTELLO, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.; LILIANA M. DÁVALO, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Consortium for Inter-disciplinary Environmental Research, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.; FABIO DE OLIVEIRA ROQUE, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Pioneiros, MS, Brazil.; FABRICE DECLERCK, Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Montpellier, France.; LAURA E. DEE, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.; FRANZ ESSL, Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.; SIMON FERRIER, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Canberra, NSW, Australia.; PIERO GENOVESI, Italian National Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), Rome, Italy.; MANUEL R. GUARIGUATA, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) and World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Lima, Peru,; SHIZUKA HASHIMOTO, Scopus Graduate School of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.; CHINWE IFEJIKA SPERANZA, Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.; FOREST ISBELL, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.; MARCEL KOK, PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, the Hague, the Netherlands.; SHANE D. LAVERY, School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Marine Science University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.; DAVID LECLÈRE, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program (BNR), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.; RAFAEL LOYOLA, International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.; SHUAIB LWASA, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.; MELODIE MCGEOCH, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environment, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; AKIRA S. MORI, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.; EMILY NICHOLSON, Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.; JOSE M. OCHOA, Coral Reef Ecosystems Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; KINGA ÖLLERER, Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót, Hungary.; STEPHEN POLASKY, Department of Applied Economics and Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.; CARLO RONDININI, Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.; SIBYLLE SCHROER, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, German.; ODIRILWE SELOMANE, Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.; XIAOLI SHEN, State key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.; BERNARDO STRASSBURG, International Institute for Sustainability, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazi.; USSIF RASHID SUMAILA, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.; DEREK P. TITTENSOR, Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.; EREN TURAK, New South Wales Department of Planning, Industry, and Environment, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.; LUIS URBINA, Coral Reef Ecosystems Lab, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.; MARÍA VALLEJOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay./Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ELLA VÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, Scopus Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.; PETER H. VERBURG, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.; PIERO VISCONTI, Biodiversity and Natural Resources Program (BNR), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.; STEPHEN WOODLEY, International Union for Conservation of Nature World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN WCPA), Chelsea, QC, Canada.; JIANCHU XU, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China. |
|
Título : |
Achieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
One Earth, 2022, Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 597-603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Artticle history: Available online 17 June 2022, Version of Record 17 June 2022. |
|
Contenido : |
Human impacts on the Earth's biosphere are driving the global biodiversity crisis. Governments are preparing to agree on a set of actions intended to halt the loss of biodiversity and put it on a path to recovery by 2050. We provide evidence that the proposed actions can bend the curve for biodiversity, but only if these actions are implemented urgently and in an integrated manner |
|
Palabras claves : |
Earth's biosphere; Global biodiversity crisis; Global biodiversity framework; Human impacts; PLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIODIVERSIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02703naa a2200829 a 4500
001 1063438
005 2022-07-20
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009$2DOI
100 1 $aLEADLEY, P.
245 $aAchieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArtticle history: Available online 17 June 2022, Version of Record 17 June 2022.
520 $aHuman impacts on the Earth's biosphere are driving the global biodiversity crisis. Governments are preparing to agree on a set of actions intended to halt the loss of biodiversity and put it on a path to recovery by 2050. We provide evidence that the proposed actions can bend the curve for biodiversity, but only if these actions are implemented urgently and in an integrated manner
650 $aBIODIVERSIDAD
653 $aEarth's biosphere
653 $aGlobal biodiversity crisis
653 $aGlobal biodiversity framework
653 $aHuman impacts
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL
700 1 $aGONZALEZ, A.
700 1 $aOBURA, D.
700 1 $aKRUG, C.B.
700 1 $aLONDOÑO-MURCIA, M.C.
700 1 $aMILLETTE, K.L.
700 1 $aRADULOVICI, A.
700 1 $aRANKOVIC, A.
700 1 $aSHANNON, L.J.
700 1 $aARCHER, E.
700 1 $aATO ARMAH, F.
700 1 $aNIC BAX, N,
700 1 $aCHAUDHARI, K.
700 1 $aCOSTELLO, M.J.
700 1 $aDÁVALOS, L.M.
700 1 $aROQUE, F DE O
700 1 $aDECLERCK, F.
700 1 $aDEE, L.E.
700 1 $aESSL, F.
700 1 $aFERRIER, S.
700 1 $aGENOVESI, P.
700 1 $aGUARIGUATA, M.R.
700 1 $aHASHIMOTO, S.
700 1 $aIFEJIKA SPERANZA, CH.
700 1 $aISBELL, F.
700 1 $aKOK, M.
700 1 $aLAVERY, S.D.
700 1 $aLECLÈRE, D.
700 1 $aLOYOLA, R.
700 1 $aLWASA, S.
700 1 $aMCGEOCH, M.
700 1 $aMORI, A.S.
700 1 $aNICHOLSON, E.
700 1 $aOCHOA, J.M.
700 1 $aÖLLERER, K.
700 1 $aPOLASKY, S.
700 1 $aRONDININI, C.
700 1 $aSCHROER, S.
700 1 $aSELOMANE, O.
700 1 $aSHEN, X.
700 1 $aSTRASSBURG, B.
700 1 $aRASHID SUMAILA, U.
700 1 $aTITTENSOR, D.P.
700 1 $aTURAK, E.
700 1 $aURBINA, L.
700 1 $aVALLEJOS, M.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ-DOMÍNGUEZ, E.
700 1 $aVERBURG, P.H.
700 1 $aVISCONTI, P.
700 1 $aWOODLEY, S.
700 1 $aXU, J.
773 $tOne Earth, 2022, Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 597-603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.05.009
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
08/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
BENTANCOR, L.; HERNÁNDEZ, J.; DEL PINO, A.; CALIFRA, A.; RESQUÍN, F.; GONZÁLEZ-BARRIOS, P. |
|
Afiliación : |
LUIS BENTANCOR, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; JORGE HERNÁNDEZ, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; AMABELIA DEL PINO, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; ÁLVARO CALIFRA, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; JOSE FERNANDO RESQUIN PEREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO GONZÁLEZ-BARRIOS, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía. |
|
Título : |
Evaluation of the biomass production, energy yield and nutrient removal of Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden grown in short rotation coppice under two initial planting densities and harvest systems. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Biomass and Bioenergy, 2019, v. 122, p. 165-174. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.019 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 31 August 2018 // Received in revised form 18 January 2019 // Accepted 21 January 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
Bioenergy is an important component of the renewable energy mix, helping to ensure a stable energy supply. One of the alternatives for bioenergy production is the use of Eucalypts sp. grown on short rotation coppice under different harvest systems. Because in some cases all components of the tree are harvested, there could be implications regarding the sustainability of this type of system. For this reason, new information is required to assess this alternative energy source. The objective of the research was to estimate the biomass production, energy yield, nutrient concentration, nutrient removal, and energy yield per kg of nutrient removal (EYNR) of four years old E. dunnii using two initial planting densities (3 m×1.5 m and 3 m×0.75 m) into two different
sites comparing two harvest systems; stemwood without debarking (System A) vs whole tree (System B). There was no impact of the planting density on the biomass production and energy yield per hectare. Significant differences of nutrient concentrations in different tree components were observed, but generally with similar magnitude between the two densities. The magnitude of nutrients removal caused by forest biomass varied depending on the nutrient, tree component, and biomass production. For the biomass production, energy yield, nutrient removal per hectare and EYNR system B was always significantly higher than system A. According to these results system B is more efficient from the energy yield perspective, but less sustainable from the soil
fertility point of view. MenosBioenergy is an important component of the renewable energy mix, helping to ensure a stable energy supply. One of the alternatives for bioenergy production is the use of Eucalypts sp. grown on short rotation coppice under different harvest systems. Because in some cases all components of the tree are harvested, there could be implications regarding the sustainability of this type of system. For this reason, new information is required to assess this alternative energy source. The objective of the research was to estimate the biomass production, energy yield, nutrient concentration, nutrient removal, and energy yield per kg of nutrient removal (EYNR) of four years old E. dunnii using two initial planting densities (3 m×1.5 m and 3 m×0.75 m) into two different
sites comparing two harvest systems; stemwood without debarking (System A) vs whole tree (System B). There was no impact of the planting density on the biomass production and energy yield per hectare. Significant differences of nutrient concentrations in different tree components were observed, but generally with similar magnitude between the two densities. The magnitude of nutrients removal caused by forest biomass varied depending on the nutrient, tree component, and biomass production. For the biomass production, energy yield, nutrient removal per hectare and EYNR system B was always significantly higher than system A. According to these results system B is more efficient from the energy yield perspective, but less su... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
DIFFERENT PLANTATION DENSITIES; ENERGY YIELD; EUCALYPTUS SP; FOREST BIOMASS; NUTRIENTS REMOVAL; SHORT ROTATION COPPICE. |
|
Thesagro : |
FORESTACIÓN. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02609naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1027698
005 2019-10-08
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.01.019$2DOI
100 1 $aBENTANCOR, L.
245 $aEvaluation of the biomass production, energy yield and nutrient removal of Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden grown in short rotation coppice under two initial planting densities and harvest systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aArticle history: Received 31 August 2018 // Received in revised form 18 January 2019 // Accepted 21 January 2019.
520 $aBioenergy is an important component of the renewable energy mix, helping to ensure a stable energy supply. One of the alternatives for bioenergy production is the use of Eucalypts sp. grown on short rotation coppice under different harvest systems. Because in some cases all components of the tree are harvested, there could be implications regarding the sustainability of this type of system. For this reason, new information is required to assess this alternative energy source. The objective of the research was to estimate the biomass production, energy yield, nutrient concentration, nutrient removal, and energy yield per kg of nutrient removal (EYNR) of four years old E. dunnii using two initial planting densities (3 m×1.5 m and 3 m×0.75 m) into two different sites comparing two harvest systems; stemwood without debarking (System A) vs whole tree (System B). There was no impact of the planting density on the biomass production and energy yield per hectare. Significant differences of nutrient concentrations in different tree components were observed, but generally with similar magnitude between the two densities. The magnitude of nutrients removal caused by forest biomass varied depending on the nutrient, tree component, and biomass production. For the biomass production, energy yield, nutrient removal per hectare and EYNR system B was always significantly higher than system A. According to these results system B is more efficient from the energy yield perspective, but less sustainable from the soil fertility point of view.
650 $aFORESTACIÓN
653 $aDIFFERENT PLANTATION DENSITIES
653 $aENERGY YIELD
653 $aEUCALYPTUS SP
653 $aFOREST BIOMASS
653 $aNUTRIENTS REMOVAL
653 $aSHORT ROTATION COPPICE
700 1 $aHERNÁNDEZ, J.
700 1 $aDEL PINO, A.
700 1 $aCALIFRA, A.
700 1 $aRESQUÍN, F.
700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ-BARRIOS, P.
773 $tBiomass and Bioenergy, 2019$gv. 122, p. 165-174.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
